Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB350F
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Released January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Following is a extended analysis of the Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB350F, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TRYX was launched 4 years earlier than the WB350F which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the TRYX matches up against the WB350F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim TRYX & Samsung WB350F. The complete galleries are provided at Casio TRYX Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Samsung WB350F
| TRYX | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio TRYX
| WB350F | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 36 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Samsung WB350F
| TRYX | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio TRYX enjoys external measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Analyze the Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB350F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the TRYX compared to the WB350F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and WB350F is 99 and 90 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through specs. The image underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TRYX and WB350F.
All in all, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB350F to provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged TRYX will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Samsung WB350F |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 276g (0.61 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $689 | $260 |
