Epson R-D1 vs Samsung TL240
75 Imaging
42 Features
20 Overall
33
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Epson R-D1 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 1600
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 620g - 142 x 89 x 40mm
- Released March 2004
- Successor is Epson R-D1x
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternate Name is ST5000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Epson R-D1 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Epson R-D1 and Samsung TL240, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Epson and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the R-D1 (6MP) and TL240 (14MP) and the R-D1 (APS-C) and TL240 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe R-D1 was released 6 years earlier than the TL240 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Epson R-D1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the R-D1 matches up vs the TL240 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Epson R-D1 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Epson R-D1 & Samsung TL240. The complete galleries are provided at Epson R-D1 Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Epson R-D1 over the Samsung TL240
| R-D1 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 235k | 230k | Crisper screen (+5k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Epson R-D1
| TL240 | R-D1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 | March 2004 | Newer by 70 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" | 2" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Epson R-D1 and Samsung TL240
| R-D1 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Epson R-D1 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Epson R-D1 provides outer dimensions of 142mm x 89mm x 40mm (5.6" x 3.5" x 1.6") along with a weight of 620 grams (1.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Epson R-D1 and Samsung TL240 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the R-D1 vs the TL240.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the R-D1 and TL240 is 75 and 95 respectively.
Epson R-D1 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by going through technical specs. The picture here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the R-D1 and TL240.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The R-D1 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung TL240 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged R-D1 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Epson R-D1 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Epson R-D1 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Epson R-D1 | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Epson | Samsung |
| Model type | Epson R-D1 | Samsung TL240 |
| Also called as | - | ST5000 |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2004-03-11 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 369.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 6 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3008 x 2000 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Leica M | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 59 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 235 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 620g (1.37 lbs) | 160g (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 142 x 89 x 40mm (5.6" x 3.5" x 1.6") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | No | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $1,709 | $171 |