FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-10
94 Imaging
36 Features
16 Overall
28
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix AV205
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Lets look much closer at the FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-10, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe AV200 was launched 3 years earlier than the XZ-10 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the AV200 grades versus the XZ-10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The complete galleries are viewable at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Olympus XZ-10
| AV200 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the FujiFilm AV200
| XZ-10 | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 25 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Olympus XZ-10
| AV200 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm AV200 enjoys outer dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-10 has dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the AV200 vs the XZ-10.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the AV200 and XZ-10 is 94 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through specifications. The pic here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the AV200 and XZ-10.
To sum up, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the FujiFilm AV200 to show extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged AV200 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2013-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168g (0.37 lb) | 221g (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | 240 photos |
| Style of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $428 |