FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-310
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
FujiFilm AV200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix AV205
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-310, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is fairly similar and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe AV200 was released within a month of the TG-310 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the AV200 scores versus the TG-310 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Olympus TG-310. The complete galleries are viewable at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Olympus TG-310
| AV200 | TG-310 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the FujiFilm AV200
| TG-310 | AV200 |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Olympus TG-310
| AV200 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | January 2011 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display size |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The FujiFilm AV200 features outside dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-310 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the AV200 against the TG-310.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the AV200 and TG-310 is 94 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by reading a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the AV200 and TG-310.
Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of images though you really should consider the production date of the products into consideration.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with FujiFilm AV200
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-310
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
decent megapixels (14MP)
supports face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Street photography information
Olympus TG-310 Street photography information
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than competition (155 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Sports photography advice
Olympus TG-310 Sports photography advice
resolution is good (14MP)
features tracking autofocus
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (180 CIPA)
has no phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
slow fps (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (150 shots)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Travel photography information
Olympus TG-310 Travel photography information
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
terrible battery pack (180 shots)
does not contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (32mm)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
lighter than competition (155 grams)
environment proofing
decent megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse mode
not so great battery power (150 per charge)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Landscape photography advice
Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography advice
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (32mm)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
terrible battery pack (180 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse function
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
environment proofing
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
not so great battery power (150 CIPA)
missing Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with FujiFilm AV200
Vlogging with Olympus TG-310
wide angle not fantastic (32mm)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
does not contain selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic jack
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
lighter than competition (155 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Also Known as | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | 150 shots |
| Style of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $0 |
