FujiFilm AV200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
16 Overall
28
94 Imaging
36 Features
16 Overall
28
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
FujiFilm AV200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
FujiFilm AV200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix AV205
Pentax WG-3 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm AV200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the FujiFilm AV200 and Pentax WG-3 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Pentax. The resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the WG-3 GPS (16MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe AV200 was announced 3 years before the WG-3 GPS which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the AV200 scores against the WG-3 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm AV200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 & Pentax WG-3 GPS. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery & Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| AV200 | WG-3 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the FujiFilm AV200
| WG-3 GPS | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2013 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 30 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
| AV200 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The FujiFilm AV200 offers external dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 GPS has sizing of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm AV200 and Pentax WG-3 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the AV200 versus the WG-3 GPS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the AV200 and WG-3 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes purely by seeing a spec sheet. The picture here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the AV200 and WG-3 GPS.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Pentax WG-3 GPS to produce greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged AV200 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Portrait photography information
Pentax WG-3 GPS Portrait photography information
good MP (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
you can focus manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect autofocus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Street photography info
Pentax WG-3 GPS Street photography info
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
heavier than competition (238 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Sports photography advice
Pentax WG-3 GPS Sports photography advice
good MP (14MP)
offers tracking focus
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
slow frames per second (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (180 CIPA)
no phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
environment sealing
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (240 CIPA)
does not have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Travel photography factors
Pentax WG-3 GPS Travel photography factors
good MP (14MP)
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse function
terrible battery life (180 per charge)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (32mm)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
environment sealing
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery power (240 CIPA)
heavier than competition (238g)
display is not selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Landscape photography features
Pentax WG-3 GPS Landscape photography features
good MP (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (32mm)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
terrible battery life (180 shots)
lack of Timelapse function
you can focus manually
relatively wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
good sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
terrible battery power (240 shots)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Vlogging information
Pentax WG-3 GPS Vlogging information
wide angle not great (32mm)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone socket
relatively wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have mic socket
heavier than competition (238 grams)
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm AV200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Pentax |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
| Also called as | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2013-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lb) | 238 gr (0.52 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Battery type | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $0 | $350 |