FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung SL102
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix AV205
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Additionally Known as ES55
Photography Glossary FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the FujiFilm AV200 versus Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the AV200 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe AV200 was unveiled 2 years later than the SL102 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the AV200 scores vs the SL102 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Samsung SL102. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Samsung SL102
| AV200 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the FujiFilm AV200
| SL102 | AV200 |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Samsung SL102
| AV200 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The FujiFilm AV200 has got outer measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm AV200 versus Samsung SL102 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the AV200 compared to the SL102.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the AV200 and SL102 is 94 and 96 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the AV200 and SL102.
As you have seen, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the FujiFilm AV200 to offer you greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more recent AV200 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Samsung SL102 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix AV205 | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | - |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lb) | 116 grams (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Battery type | AA | - |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $130 |
