Clicky

FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung WB50F

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
16
Overall
28
FujiFilm FinePix AV200 front
 
Samsung WB50F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38

FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs

FujiFilm AV200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
  • 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2011
  • Additionally Known as FinePix AV205
Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Released January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung WB50F Overview

Lets look more closely at the FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung WB50F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The AV200 was revealed 4 years earlier than the WB50F and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the AV200 matches up vs the WB50F for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

				

Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Samsung WB50F

 AV200 WB50F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the FujiFilm AV200

 WB50F AV200 
ReleasedJanuary 2014January 2011Fresher by 36 months
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Samsung WB50F

 AV200 WB50F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The FujiFilm AV200 enjoys exterior measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has sizing of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).

Examine the FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung WB50F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the AV200 versus the WB50F.

FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung WB50F size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the AV200 and WB50F is 94 and 92 respectively.

FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison

FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the AV200 and WB50F.

Clearly, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Samsung WB50F to give greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older AV200 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison

FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder

FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

FujiFilm AV200 Portrait photography details
Samsung WB50F Portrait photography details
28
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
37
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

FujiFilm AV200 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Street photography camera
47
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (207g)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

FujiFilm AV200 Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB50F Sports photography highlights
29
decent megapixels (14MP)
provides tracking autofocus
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
max fps very slow (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery (180 shots)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
40
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

FujiFilm AV200 Travel photography details
Samsung WB50F Travel photography details
56
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse recording
terrible battery (180 shots)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (32mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
69
lighter than competition in class (207 grams)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
very long reach (288mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

FujiFilm AV200 Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB50F Landscape photography factors
28
decent megapixels (14MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (32mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
terrible battery (180 shots)
lack of Time Lapse recording
47
has manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm AV200 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB50F as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not great (32mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic port
30
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (207 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm AV200 and Samsung WB50F
 FujiFilm FinePix AV200Samsung WB50F
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Samsung
Model type FujiFilm FinePix AV200 Samsung WB50F
Otherwise known as FinePix AV205 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2011-01-05 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Highest enhanced ISO 3200 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 32-96mm (3.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.9-5.2 f/3.1-6.3
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8s -
Max shutter speed 1/1400s -
Continuous shutter rate 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.50 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 168 gr (0.37 pounds) 207 gr (0.46 pounds)
Physical dimensions 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 photographs -
Type of battery AA -
Battery ID 2 x AA BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots One One
Cost at release $0 $180