FujiFilm AV250 vs Samsung WB800F
94 Imaging
38 Features
20 Overall
30
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
FujiFilm AV250 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix AV255
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm AV250 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the FujiFilm AV250 and Samsung WB800F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the AV250 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe AV250 was brought out 24 months earlier than the WB800F making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the AV250 scores vs the WB800F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm AV250 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix AV250 and Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm AV250 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV250 over the Samsung WB800F
| AV250 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the FujiFilm AV250
| WB800F | AV250 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV250 and Samsung WB800F
| AV250 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
FujiFilm AV250 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm AV250 features external dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm AV250 and Samsung WB800F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the AV250 vs the WB800F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the AV250 and WB800F is 94 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm AV250 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specifications. The visual here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the AV250 and WB800F.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution and you should expect similar quality of photos however you should always factor the release date of the products into consideration. The older AV250 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm AV250 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
FujiFilm AV250 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV250 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AV250 | Samsung WB800F |
| Also referred to as | FinePix AV255 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) | 218 grams (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | - |
| Type of battery | AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $160 | $300 |