FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus VR-320
Portability
94 Imaging
38 Features
16 Overall
29
94 Imaging
38 Features
16 Overall
29
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
FujiFilm AX350
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 33-165mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix AX355
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Updated by Olympus VR-330
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here, we are comparing the FujiFilm AX350 and Olympus VR-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the AX350 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe AX350 was revealed 6 months earlier than the VR-320 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the AX350 matches up against the VR-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix AX350 and Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm AX350 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AX350 over the Olympus VR-320
| AX350 | VR-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the FujiFilm AX350
| VR-320 | AX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the FujiFilm AX350 and Olympus VR-320
| AX350 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | July 2011 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The FujiFilm AX350 enjoys outside measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm AX350 and Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the AX350 compared to the VR-320.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the AX350 and VR-320 is 94 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes simply by looking at specs. The pic underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the AX350 and VR-320.
All in all, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the FujiFilm AX350 to give more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics way more aggressively.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm AX350 Portrait photography advice
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography advice
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
features face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
FujiFilm AX350 Street photography info
Olympus VR-320 Street photography info
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (158 grams)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
FujiFilm AX350 Sports photography advice
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography advice
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (180 CIPA)
has no phase detect auto focus
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
features tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
FujiFilm AX350 Travel photography details
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography details
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse function
bad battery pack (180 CIPA)
does not have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
lighter than others (158g)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm AX350 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography highlights
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
bad battery pack (180 shots)
lack of Timelapse function
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm AX350 Vlogging factors
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging factors
wide angle not good (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
does not have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone port
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
lighter than others (158 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Also referred to as | FinePix AX355 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 33-165mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | - |
| Battery style | AA | - |
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $179 |