FujiFilm AX350 vs Panasonic FX75
94 Imaging
38 Features
16 Overall
29
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
FujiFilm AX350 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 33-165mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix AX355
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Released June 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm AX350 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Following is a complete review of the FujiFilm AX350 vs Panasonic FX75, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies FujiFilm and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the AX350 (16MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is very close and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe AX350 was revealed 8 months after the FX75 which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the AX350 scores vs the FX75 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm AX350 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix AX350 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm AX350 Gallery and Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AX350 over the Panasonic FX75
| AX350 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the FujiFilm AX350
| FX75 | AX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm AX350 and Panasonic FX75
| AX350 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same display size |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
FujiFilm AX350 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The FujiFilm AX350 features exterior dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has specifications of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
See the FujiFilm AX350 vs Panasonic FX75 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the AX350 and the FX75.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the AX350 and FX75 is 94 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes purely by viewing technical specs. The picture here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the AX350 and FX75.
As you can tell, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should expect to see the FujiFilm AX350 to provide you with extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The younger AX350 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
FujiFilm AX350 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Also called as | FinePix AX355 | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2010-06-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 33-165mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 7.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) | 165 grams (0.36 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Battery style | AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $139 |