FujiFilm AX350 vs Samsung WB250F
94 Imaging
39 Features
16 Overall
29
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
FujiFilm AX350 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 33-165mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix AX355
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm AX350 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the FujiFilm AX350 versus Samsung WB250F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the AX350 (16MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe AX350 was manufactured 24 months before the WB250F which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the AX350 matches up versus the WB250F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm AX350 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix AX350 & Samsung WB250F. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm AX350 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AX350 over the Samsung WB250F
| AX350 | WB250F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the FujiFilm AX350
| WB250F | AX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm AX350 and Samsung WB250F
| AX350 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
FujiFilm AX350 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The FujiFilm AX350 features outside measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has specifications of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm AX350 versus Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the AX350 against the WB250F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the AX350 and WB250F is 94 and 93 respectively.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The photograph underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the AX350 and WB250F.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the FujiFilm AX350 to give more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The older AX350 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
FujiFilm AX350 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Samsung WB250F |
| Also called as | FinePix AX355 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 33-165mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lb) | 226 grams (0.50 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | - |
| Battery style | AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $0 | $250 |