FujiFilm F300EXR vs FujiFilm XP10

Let's take a deeper look at the FujiFilm F300EXR versus FujiFilm XP10, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and both are offered by FujiFilm. The image resolution of the F300EXR (12MP) and the XP10 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the F300EXR (1/2") and XP10 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The F300EXR was manufactured 6 months later than the XP10 and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the F300EXR grades versus the XP10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Here is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR & FujiFilm FinePix XP10. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm F300EXR Gallery & FujiFilm XP10 Gallery.

If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The FujiFilm F300EXR comes with physical dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) while the FujiFilm XP10 has sizing of 96mm x 64mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs).

Look at the FujiFilm F300EXR versus FujiFilm XP10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the F300EXR versus the XP10.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the F300EXR and XP10 is 91 and 95 respectively.

In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the F300EXR and XP10.

As you can see, both cameras come with the identical MP albeit not the same sensor sizing. The F300EXR offers the bigger sensor which should make getting shallower depth of field easier.