FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
91 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Additionally referred to as FinePix F305EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the F300EXR (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar but the F300EXR (1/2") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor size.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe F300EXR was manufactured 3 years before the XZ-2 iHS which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the F300EXR scores vs the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm F300EXR Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F300EXR over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
F300EXR | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the FujiFilm F300EXR
XZ-2 iHS | F300EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | July 2010 | More modern by 29 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm F300EXR and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
F300EXR | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The FujiFilm F300EXR features external dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the F300EXR vs the XZ-2 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the F300EXR and XZ-2 iHS is 91 and 85 respectively.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes only by going over specifications. The image underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the F300EXR and XZ-2 iHS.
Plainly, both of these cameras have the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizes. The F300EXR includes the tinier sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF harder. The more aged F300EXR is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Otherwise known as | FinePix F305EXR | - |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-07-21 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 215g (0.47 pounds) | 346g (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $280 | $450 |