FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB750
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched July 2010
- Alternate Name is FinePix F305EXR
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Released September 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB750, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the F300EXR (12MP) and the WB750 (13MP) is relatively comparable but the F300EXR (1/2") and WB750 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe F300EXR was revealed 13 months earlier than the WB750 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the F300EXR grades versus the WB750 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR & Samsung WB750. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm F300EXR Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F300EXR over the Samsung WB750
| F300EXR | WB750 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the FujiFilm F300EXR
| WB750 | F300EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 | July 2010 | Newer by 13 months | |
| Manually focus | More exact focus |
Common features in the FujiFilm F300EXR and Samsung WB750
| F300EXR | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | The same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and size. The FujiFilm F300EXR provides outside dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Samsung WB750 has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB750 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the F300EXR against the WB750.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the F300EXR and WB750 is 91 and 93 respectively.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions merely by checking out technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the F300EXR and WB750.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The F300EXR using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung WB750 will provide more detail because of its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged F300EXR will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Samsung WB750 |
| Also called as | FinePix F305EXR | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-07-21 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 13MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 215 grams (0.47 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $280 | $339 |