FujiFilm F70EXR vs Panasonic ZS15
93 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Panasonic ZS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 205g - 99 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternate Name is FinePix F75EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 208g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Introduced June 2012
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ25
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS20
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm F70EXR vs Panasonic ZS15 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the FujiFilm F70EXR vs Panasonic ZS15, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Panasonic. The resolution of the F70EXR (10MP) and the ZS15 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the F70EXR (1/2") and ZS15 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe F70EXR was revealed 3 years before the ZS15 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the F70EXR matches up against the ZS15 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary FujiFilm F70EXR vs Panasonic ZS15 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm F70EXR Gallery & Panasonic ZS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F70EXR over the Panasonic ZS15
| F70EXR | ZS15 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS15 over the FujiFilm F70EXR
| ZS15 | F70EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2012 | July 2009 | More modern by 35 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm F70EXR and Panasonic ZS15
| F70EXR | ZS15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Panasonic ZS15 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm F70EXR features outer dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS15 has measurements of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm F70EXR vs Panasonic ZS15 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the F70EXR and the ZS15.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the F70EXR and ZS15 is 93 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Panasonic ZS15 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The image underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the F70EXR and ZS15.
As you have seen, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The F70EXR using its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Panasonic ZS15 will show more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged F70EXR will be behind in sensor tech.
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Panasonic ZS15 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Panasonic ZS15 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 |
| Also Known as | FinePix F75EXR | Lumix DMC-TZ25 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2012-06-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3616 x 2712 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-270mm (10.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.6 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | 6.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $280 | $279 |