FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB150F
93 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 205g - 99 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also referred to as FinePix F75EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Below, we are analyzing the FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB150F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the F70EXR (10MP) and WB150F (14MP) and the F70EXR (1/2") and WB150F (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe F70EXR was unveiled 3 years earlier than the WB150F which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the F70EXR scores versus the WB150F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR and Samsung WB150F. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm F70EXR Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F70EXR over the Samsung WB150F
| F70EXR | WB150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the FujiFilm F70EXR
| WB150F | F70EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 | July 2009 | Newer by 30 months | |
| Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm F70EXR and Samsung WB150F
| F70EXR | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm F70EXR provides physical dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung WB150F has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB150F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the F70EXR vs the WB150F.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the F70EXR and WB150F is 93 and 93 respectively.
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The pic here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the F70EXR and WB150F.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The F70EXR having a larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung WB150F will offer greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged F70EXR is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR | Samsung WB150F |
| Also referred to as | FinePix F75EXR | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3616 x 2712 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-270mm (10.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 188 gr (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $280 | $230 |