Clicky

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27
Olympus FE-4000 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs

Olympus FE-4000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Alternative Name is X-925
Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Revealed August 2015
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview

In this write-up, we are comparing the Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are produced by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) and the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and E-M10 II (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The FE-4000 was released 7 years earlier than the E-M10 II which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the FE-4000 scores versus the E-M10 II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 FE-4000 E-M10 II 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus FE-4000

 E-M10 II FE-4000 
RevealedAugust 2015July 2009More modern by 74 months
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kSharper display (+810k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus E-M10 II

 FE-4000 E-M10 II 
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 enjoys exterior measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 II has specifications of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).

Check out the Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the FE-4000 compared to the E-M10 II.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and E-M10 II is 95 and 82 respectively.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through specs. The pic below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4000 and E-M10 II.

All in all, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The FE-4000 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus E-M10 II will give extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged FE-4000 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography advice
21
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
72
focusing manually
good resolution (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Street photography information
Olympus E-M10 II Street photography information
55
lighter than others (136g)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
83
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
comes with touch focus
good ISO range (25,600)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Sports photography advice
Olympus E-M10 II Sports photography advice
17
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
does not have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Travel photography advice
Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography advice
62
lighter than others (136g)
built-in flash
decently wide (26mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
73
comes with touch focus
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
does not have selfie friendly display
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography highlights
28
decently wide (26mm)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
79
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus FE-4000
Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 II
28
decently wide (26mm)
lighter than others (136g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing mic port
35
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not have selfie friendly display
lack of microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus E-M10 II
 Olympus FE-4000Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus FE-4000 Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
Also called as X-925 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2009-07-22 2015-08-25
Body design Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 25600
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW files
Min enhanced ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points - 81
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 26-105mm (4.0x) -
Highest aperture f/2.6-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 3cm -
Available lenses - 107
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dot 1,040k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.62x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 5.80 m (ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 136 grams (0.30 lb) 390 grams (0.86 lb)
Dimensions 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 73
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 842
Other
Battery life - 320 shots
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-50
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $130 $499