Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are produced by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) and the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and E-M10 II (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FE-4000 was released 7 years earlier than the E-M10 II which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the FE-4000 scores versus the E-M10 II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4000 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus E-M10 II
FE-4000 | E-M10 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus FE-4000
E-M10 II | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | July 2009 | More modern by 74 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus E-M10 II
FE-4000 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 enjoys exterior measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 II has specifications of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Check out the Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the FE-4000 compared to the E-M10 II.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and E-M10 II is 95 and 82 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through specs. The pic below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4000 and E-M10 II.
All in all, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The FE-4000 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus E-M10 II will give extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged FE-4000 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Also called as | X-925 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2015-08-25 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 136 grams (0.30 lb) | 390 grams (0.86 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 842 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $130 | $499 |