FujiFilm F80EXR vs Kodak Z950

Let's look a bit more in depth at the FujiFilm F80EXR vs Kodak Z950, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Kodak. The resolution of the F80EXR (12MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is relatively close but the F80EXR (1/2") and Z950 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The F80EXR was brought out within a month of the Z950 so they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the F80EXR scores versus the Z950 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

The following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR and Kodak EasyShare Z950. The entire galleries are provided at FujiFilm F80EXR Gallery and Kodak Z950 Gallery.

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm F80EXR enjoys outer measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Kodak Z950 has measurements of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).

Analyze the FujiFilm F80EXR vs Kodak Z950 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the F80EXR versus the Z950.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the F80EXR and Z950 is 92 and 89 respectively.

In many cases, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching specifications. The graphic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the F80EXR and Z950.

To sum up, both the cameras come with the identical MP albeit not the same sensor measurements. The F80EXR comes with the bigger sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field easier.