Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc02/3cc02b21bcc1b0f5d096d59208c0f114056c9ece" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90636/906367f78182e973de499b537fdc76fa3fafdc16" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Introduced August 2020
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Here is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Olympus TG-850 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M10 IV was announced 6 years later than the TG-850 iHS and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M10 IV grades vs the TG-850 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery and Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-M10 IV | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2020 | ![]() | January 2014 | Fresher by 80 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 IV
TG-850 iHS | E-M10 IV |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-M10 IV | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 IV has outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Olympus TG-850 iHS has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Olympus TG-850 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 IV compared to the TG-850 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32bab/32bab9de688f13d585ff3c96325c1ab862a5b83c" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and TG-850 iHS is 81 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/728f5/728f5b2d5ec87293b2da81bd16ea8ee44bce5fee" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 IV and TG-850 iHS.
As you can see, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 IV with its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 IV will offer more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The younger E-M10 IV provides an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccd27/ccd27452aa2d4082299b11618c02b0112fea37d1" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e6e0/0e6e01ae800edd88b111ad97efe2ab866d4fa2a1" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2020-08-04 | 2014-01-29 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4616 x 3464 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/2 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.7fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | - |
Flash modes | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 383g (0.84 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | 330 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $699 | $250 |