Clicky

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus E-500

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
28
Overall
32
FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR front
 
Olympus E-500 front
Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus E-500 Key Specs

FujiFilm F80EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
  • 210g - 99 x 59 x 28mm
  • Released June 2010
  • Other Name is FinePix F85EXR
Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Released October 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
  • Renewed by Olympus E-510
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus E-500 Overview

Following is a in-depth review of the FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus E-500, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the F80EXR (12MP) and E-500 (8MP) and the F80EXR (1/2") and E-500 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The F80EXR was brought out 4 years after the E-500 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm F80EXR being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the F80EXR scores versus the E-500 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

				

Reasons to pick FujiFilm F80EXR over the Olympus E-500

 F80EXR E-500 
ReleasedJune 2010October 2005More modern by 57 months
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution230k215kSharper screen (+15k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the FujiFilm F80EXR

 E-500 F80EXR 
Manually focus More accurate focusing

Common features in the FujiFilm F80EXR and Olympus E-500

 F80EXR E-500 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus E-500 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The FujiFilm F80EXR has exterior dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-500 has specifications of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs).

Check out the FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus E-500 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the F80EXR vs the E-500.

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus E-500 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the F80EXR and E-500 is 92 and 70 respectively.

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus E-500 top view buttons comparison

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus E-500 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes just by reading technical specs. The picture underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the F80EXR and E-500.

As you can tell, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The F80EXR due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the FujiFilm F80EXR will deliver extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more modern F80EXR is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus E-500 sensor size comparison

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus E-500 Screen and ViewFinder

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus E-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with FujiFilm F80EXR
Portrait photography with Olympus E-500
21
no manual focus
can't use external flash
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2")
lacks RAW support
48
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no liveview
sensor resolution low (8MP)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

FujiFilm F80EXR Street photography advice
Olympus E-500 Street photography advice
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2")
lacks RAW support
more heavy than competitors in class (210g)
56
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
lighter than average (479g)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with FujiFilm F80EXR
Sports photography with Olympus E-500
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2")
lacks phase detect AF
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
no liveview
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with FujiFilm F80EXR
Travel photography with Olympus E-500
58
built-in flash
pretty wide (27mm)
very long reach (270mm)
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors in class (210 grams)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
52
lighter than average (479g)
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse function
sensor resolution low (8MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

FujiFilm F80EXR as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-500 as a Landscape photography camera
38
pretty wide (27mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2")
lacks RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
43
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
small screen (2.5")
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
doesn't have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm F80EXR as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-500 as a Vlogging camera
27
pretty wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone port
more heavy than competitors in class (210 grams)
9
no video
Photography Glossary

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus E-500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm F80EXR and Olympus E-500
 FujiFilm FinePix F80EXROlympus E-500
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Olympus
Model FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR Olympus E-500
Otherwise known as FinePix F85EXR EVOLT E-500
Type Small Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Released 2010-06-16 2005-10-21
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Chip EXR -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.4 x 4.8mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 8 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 3264 x 2448
Max native ISO 1600 400
Max boosted ISO 12800 1600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 27-270mm (10.0x) -
Max aperture f/3.3-5.6 -
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Amount of lenses - 45
Crop factor 5.6 2.1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.5 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 215 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.45x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.20 m 13.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1280x720 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 210 grams (0.46 lbs) 479 grams (1.06 lbs)
Dimensions 99 x 59 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC Internal Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $400 $600