FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX2
60 Imaging
34 Features
50 Overall
40
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 666g - 131 x 91 x 126mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Other Name is FinePix HS11
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the FujiFilm HS10 versus Ricoh CX2, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the HS10 (10MP) and the CX2 (9MP) is fairly well matched and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe HS10 was brought out 11 months after the CX2 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm HS10 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the HS10 scores against the CX2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix HS10 and Ricoh CX2. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm HS10 Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm HS10 over the Ricoh CX2
| HS10 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2010 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 11 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the FujiFilm HS10
| CX2 | HS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm HS10 and Ricoh CX2
| HS10 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The FujiFilm HS10 provides outside dimensions of 131mm x 91mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") having a weight of 666 grams (1.47 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm HS10 versus Ricoh CX2 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the HS10 versus the CX2.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the HS10 and CX2 is 60 and 93 respectively.
FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the HS10 and CX2.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should anticipate the FujiFilm HS10 to give you more detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The more modern HS10 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix HS10 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix HS10 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix HS11 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 666 grams (1.47 lb) | 185 grams (0.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 131 x 91 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $900 | $341 |
