FujiFilm HS10 vs Samsung SL102
60 Imaging
34 Features
50 Overall
40
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
FujiFilm HS10 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 666g - 131 x 91 x 126mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Additionally Known as FinePix HS11
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Other Name is ES55
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing FujiFilm HS10 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the FujiFilm HS10 versus Samsung SL102, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the HS10 (10MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is very similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe HS10 was unveiled 19 months later than the SL102 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm HS10 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a short summary of how the HS10 grades versus the SL102 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm HS10 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix HS10 and Samsung SL102. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm HS10 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm HS10 over the Samsung SL102
| HS10 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 19 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the FujiFilm HS10
| SL102 | HS10 |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm HS10 and Samsung SL102
| HS10 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
FujiFilm HS10 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm HS10 features external dimensions of 131mm x 91mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") with a weight of 666 grams (1.47 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm HS10 versus Samsung SL102 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the HS10 and the SL102.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the HS10 and SL102 is 60 and 96 respectively.
FujiFilm HS10 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading technical specs. The graphic underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the HS10 and SL102.
As you can tell, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP and you should expect similar quality of images although you need to factor the production date of the products into consideration. The fresher HS10 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm HS10 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
FujiFilm HS10 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix HS10 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix HS10 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also called as | FinePix HS11 | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-07-06 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 666g (1.47 lb) | 116g (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 131 x 91 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $900 | $130 |
