Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
89 Imaging
47 Features
52 Overall
49
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL7
- New Model is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed November 2011
- Successor is Olympus E-PM2
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and E-PM1 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-PL8 was revealed 4 years after the E-PM1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the E-PL8 grades vs the E-PM1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Olympus PEN E-PM1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Olympus E-PM1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus E-PM1
| E-PL8 | E-PM1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2016 |  | November 2011 | More modern by 59 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Olympus E-PL8
| E-PM1 | E-PL8 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus E-PM1
| E-PL8 | E-PM1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL8 enjoys external measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PM1 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-PL8 and the E-PM1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL8 and E-PM1 is 86 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out specifications. The picture here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL8 and E-PM1.
To sum up, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Olympus E-PL8 to produce more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger E-PL8 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus PEN E-PM1 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2011-11-23 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 357 gr (0.79 lb) | 265 gr (0.58 lb) |
| Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 52 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 499 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 330 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $500 | $499 |