Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
89 Imaging
47 Features
52 Overall
49
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL7
- New Model is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed November 2011
- Successor is Olympus E-PM2
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and E-PM1 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-PL8 was revealed 4 years after the E-PM1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the E-PL8 grades vs the E-PM1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Olympus PEN E-PM1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Olympus E-PM1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus E-PM1
| E-PL8 | E-PM1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2016 |  | November 2011 | More modern by 59 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Olympus E-PL8
| E-PM1 | E-PL8 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus E-PM1
| E-PL8 | E-PM1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL8 enjoys external measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PM1 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-PL8 and the E-PM1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL8 and E-PM1 is 86 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out specifications. The picture here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL8 and E-PM1.
To sum up, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Olympus E-PL8 to produce more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger E-PL8 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus E-PM1 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus PEN E-PM1 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2011-11-23 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 357 gr (0.79 lb) | 265 gr (0.58 lb) |
| Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 52 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 499 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 330 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $500 | $499 |