FujiFilm JV200 vs Nikon A900
96 Imaging
37 Features
18 Overall
29
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
FujiFilm JV200 vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Also Known as FinePix JV205
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Released February 2016
- Successor is Nikon A1000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm JV200 vs Nikon A900 Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the FujiFilm JV200 vs Nikon A900, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Nikon. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the JV200 (14MP) and A900 (20MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe JV200 was manufactured 6 years prior to the A900 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the JV200 grades against the A900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm JV200 vs Nikon A900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix JV200 & Nikon Coolpix A900. The entire galleries are provided at FujiFilm JV200 Gallery & Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Nikon A900
| JV200 | A900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the FujiFilm JV200
| A900 | JV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 62 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm JV200 and Nikon A900
| JV200 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm JV200 vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm JV200 provides outer dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Nikon A900 has measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm JV200 vs Nikon A900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the JV200 vs the A900.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the JV200 and A900 is 96 and 88 respectively.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specs. The image underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the JV200 and A900.
All in all, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Nikon A900 to offer more detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged JV200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm JV200 vs Nikon A900 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
| Also called as | FinePix JV205 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.4-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 pounds) | 289g (0.64 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | 300 images |
| Battery format | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $49 | $400 |