Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 front
Portability
91
Imaging
45
Features
37
Overall
41

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Announced August 2008
  • Replaced the Olympus E-510
Sony QX30
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • " Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
  • 193g - 68 x 65 x 58mm
  • Launched September 2014
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 Overview

Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Lens-style by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and QX30 (20MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and QX30 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-520 was announced 7 years before the QX30 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony QX30 being a Lens-style camera.

Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-520 grades vs the QX30 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sony QX30

 E-520 QX30 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Display dimension2.7""Larger display (+2.7")
Display resolution230k0kSharper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX30 over the Olympus E-520

 QX30 E-520 
LaunchedSeptember 2014August 2008More recent by 73 months
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sony QX30

 E-520 QX30 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 Physical Comparison

If you are going to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 comes with exterior dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Sony QX30 has proportions of 68mm x 65mm x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-520 vs the QX30.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and QX30 is 68 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The photograph here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and QX30.

To sum up, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-520 with its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Sony QX30 will show greater detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-520 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography advice
Sony QX30 Portrait photography advice
59
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focusing
supports RAW files
sensor resolution low (10MP)
38
MP count decent (20MP)
offers face detect focus
manual focus not available
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-520
Street photography with Sony QX30
65
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
features touch focus
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 Sports photography highlights
Sony QX30 Sports photography highlights
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
good battery pack (650 per charge)
has phase detect AF
low fps (4.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
47
long zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (200 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 Travel photography features
Sony QX30 Travel photography features
52
good battery pack (650 shots)
has built in flash
no Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
65
features touch focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
pretty wide (24mm)
great reach (720mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
terrible battery life (200 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography features
Sony QX30 Landscape photography features
58
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
good battery pack (650 shots)
small screen (2.7")
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
no Timelapse recording
39
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen ( inch)
no manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
terrible battery life (200 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-520
Vlogging with Sony QX30
9
lack of video recording
35
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Sony QX30
 Olympus E-520Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-520 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30
Class Entry-Level DSLR Lens-style
Announced 2008-08-20 2014-09-03
Body design Compact SLR Lens-style
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-720mm (30.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.5-6.3
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" -
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 0 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1600s
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye None
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 552 gr (1.22 pounds) 193 gr (0.43 pounds)
Dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 68 x 65 x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 images 200 images
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-BN,
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $400 $348