Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
91 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 193g - 68 x 65 x 58mm
- Launched September 2014
Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Lens-style by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and QX30 (20MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and QX30 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-520 was announced 7 years before the QX30 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony QX30 being a Lens-style camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-520 grades vs the QX30 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Sony QX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sony QX30
E-520 | QX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display dimension | 2.7" | " | Larger display (+2.7") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 0k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX30 over the Olympus E-520
QX30 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2014 | August 2008 | More recent by 73 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sony QX30
E-520 | QX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 comes with exterior dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Sony QX30 has proportions of 68mm x 65mm x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-520 vs the QX30.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and QX30 is 68 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The photograph here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and QX30.
To sum up, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-520 with its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Sony QX30 will show greater detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-520 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX30 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Lens-style |
Announced | 2008-08-20 | 2014-09-03 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Lens-style |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-6.3 |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | - |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | None |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 68 x 65 x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 images | 200 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN, |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $400 | $348 |