FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung SL102
96 Imaging
36 Features
18 Overall
28
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix JV205
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the FujiFilm JV200 and Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the JV200 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe JV200 was launched 2 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the JV200 matches up vs the SL102 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix JV200 & Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are available at FujiFilm JV200 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Samsung SL102
| JV200 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | January 2009 | More recent by 25 months | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the FujiFilm JV200
| SL102 | JV200 |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm JV200 and Samsung SL102
| JV200 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm JV200 provides external dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm JV200 and Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the JV200 and the SL102.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the JV200 and SL102 is 96 and 96 respectively.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the JV200 and SL102.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the FujiFilm JV200 to produce more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The more modern JV200 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Samsung SL102 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix JV205 | ES55 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 116g (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $49 | $130 |