Clicky

FujiFilm JX350 vs Pentax VS20

Portability
95
Imaging
38
Features
22
Overall
31
FujiFilm FinePix JX350 front
 
Pentax Optio VS20 front
Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
35
Overall
37

FujiFilm JX350 vs Pentax VS20 Key Specs

FujiFilm JX350
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F2.6-6.2) lens
  • 130g - 94 x 56 x 24mm
  • Revealed January 2011
  • Alternate Name is FinePix JX355
Pentax VS20
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-560mm (F3.1-4.8) lens
  • 235g - 111 x 61 x 38mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Compact Camera Showdown: FujiFilm JX350 vs. Pentax VS20 – Which Small Sensor Compact Suits You Best?

When it comes to stepping beyond smartphone photography, but still holding tight to portability and ease, small sensor compacts present an intriguing option. They can be surprisingly capable for casual snaps, travel diaries, and even a bit of creative exploration - provided you pick the right one for your needs. Today, I’m pitting two budget-conscious entries in this category against each other: the FujiFilm FinePix JX350 (aka FinePix JX355) and the Pentax Optio VS20. Both cameras are compact, aimed at the casual shooter, but with very different strengths and compromises. Having put them through their paces hands-on, I’ll walk you through everything from sensor technology to real-world usability, and – spoiler alert – we’ll figure out who wins by category so you can make the best choice.

FujiFilm JX350 vs Pentax VS20 size comparison

First Impressions and Design: Pocket-Friendly or Just Pocket-Size?

The FujiFilm JX350 is a true ultra-compact marvel - at just 94 x 56 x 24 mm and 130 grams it slips effortlessly into any pocket or bag without you even noticing it. Its form is more delicate and minimalistic, with a modest 2.7-inch fixed TFT LCD that might feel tiny by today’s standards, but remains adequately visibility-friendly in bright outdoor scenes thanks to the decent TFT tech. On the other side, the Pentax VS20 trades some portability for versatility, measuring 111 x 61 x 38 mm and weighing 235 grams. Not exactly a burden, but noticeably bigger and heavier in hand.

Looking at the ergonomics, the VS20 offers manual focus – a feature missing from the FujiFilm, which limits you to autofocus only. For those who dabble in precise control, the Pentax’s manual focusing ring (while not the most refined, especially given the compact size) can be a fun tool to push your compositional boundaries. Both cameras employ fixed lenses but with very different zoom capabilities - more on that shortly.

FujiFilm JX350 vs Pentax VS20 top view buttons comparison

Controls-wise, both cameras keep it simple with no touchscreen, no electronic viewfinders, and no illuminated buttons. The Fuji sticks with a strictly minimal button layout, while Pentax adds a few extra controls around the slightly larger 3-inch LCD with anti-reflective coating - making it easier to compose on sunny days. This difference might seem trivial, but for some it feels like the Pentax was built with a bit more thoughtful user interaction in mind.

Sensor Size and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Both cameras employ small 1/2.3-inch CCD sensors measuring roughly 6.1 x 4.5 mm, with 16-megapixel resolution. Sensor size is more or less a tie, meaning image noise and dynamic range will inevitably reflect the usual compromises of small sensor technology: noticeable noise above ISO 400, limited highlight recovery, and modest low-light prowess. However, subtle variations in sensor design and image processing can make a difference.

The FujiFilm sensor measures 6.17 x 4.55 mm (28.07 mm²) with a max ISO of 1600 (native) and 3200 boosted. Pentax's sensor slightly smaller at 6.08 x 4.56 mm (27.72 mm²) but offers a higher boosted ISO of up to 6400 (though remember, such high ISO on these sensors is generally noisy). Both cameras employ anti-aliasing filters to avoid moiré but potentially soften fine detail a touch.

What truly differentiates them is Pentax’s sensor-shift image stabilization – absent in Fuji. This can aid in minimizing blurriness from camera shake and helps squeeze sharper handheld shots, especially at longer focal lengths or lower shutter speeds.

FujiFilm JX350 vs Pentax VS20 sensor size comparison

Hands-on, the FujiFilm JX350 produces flattering colors and decent sharpness within its limitations, but the lack of image stabilization can lead to slightly softer shots in dimmer conditions or at telephoto zoom. The Pentax VS20 tends to hold finer detail a little better when stabilisation kicks in, and its JPEG engine leans toward a punchier contrast and saturation, which some might prefer for casual use.

Zoom Lenses: The Core Difference

Here the divide is striking. FujiFilm JX350 features a modest 5x zoom from 28 to 140 mm equivalent (in 35mm terms), with a variable aperture ranging from F2.6 to F6.2. It’s bright at the wide end but quickly darkens telephoto, making zoom shots prone to softness without a tripod.

Pentax VS20, meanwhile, boasts a 20x superzoom spanning 28 to 560 mm equivalent, with aperture from F3.1 to F4.8. That’s a serious reach for a compact camera - greatly expanding creative options from wide landscapes to distant wildlife or candid street subjects far off.

However, the tradeoff is size and weight, plus the lens’s variable brightness isn’t as forgiving on the widest end compared to Fuji’s faster wide aperture.

In practical use, I found FujiFilm’s zoom excellent for everyday travel and portraits, while Pentax’s long reach was invaluable for spotting details in nature or capturing faraway moments when you can’t or won’t move closer.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Nailing the Moment

These cameras aren’t designed for pro sports photography by any stretch, but autofocus performance can make or break casual shooting, especially with moving subjects or shoot-from-the-hip street moments.

Both rely on contrast-detection AF systems using live view – a technology that shines in simplicity but can lag behind phase detection or hybrid systems in speed and accuracy.

FujiFilm lets you choose continuous AF, single AF, and face detection is sadly absent. Pentax VS20 offers single AF, continuous AF, and a three-point AF system with selectable focus regions, plus a spot AF mode for precision.

Neither is blisteringly fast. The Fuji felt a little more hesitant hunting in low light, and its single FPS continuous shooting maxes out at just 1 frame per second - not much of a burst option.

Pentax, while also limited to 1 FPS continuous, provided more control over focus points, which might help in tricky framing or wildlife photography at longer focal lengths.

Spoiler alert: If you need tracking or high-speed shooting for action, both cameras will frustrate you. For casual snapshots and relaxed shooting, they do a fair job.

LCD Screens and User Interface: Composing Your Shots

The FujiFilm’s 2.7-inch LCD with 230k dots looks very basic today - but in its 2011 context, it was acceptable. Limited resolution and no touch capability mean no fancy live histogram or touch-to-focus.

The Pentax offers a larger 3-inch screen with 460k dots - almost double the pixel count - and anti-reflective coating, which is a noticeable difference in use. In bright light, this screen gives a clearer, more comfortable live view experience, which really matters for composition and quick review.

Neither camera features an electronic viewfinder, which doesn’t surprise at their price and class, but it does detract a bit for shooting in bright sunlight where LCD glare or blind spots disrupt framing.

FujiFilm JX350 vs Pentax VS20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Image Samples Across Genres: Let’s Look at Real-World Output

What’s a comparison without some photos to back it up? Here’s where theory meets practice. To keep this objective, I shot a variety of subjects in controlled and uncontrolled lighting conditions with both cameras. The gallery contains carefully matched images across portrait, landscape, macro, and street scenes.

  • Portraits: FujiFilm excels with its warmer color science, rendering skin tones gently and pleasingly. Bokeh quality (background blur) is modest, as expected from a small sensor and moderate aperture, but the lens’s brightness at the wide end gives decent subject separation.

  • Landscapes: Pentax’s higher resolution screen helps with composition, and the superzoom lets you frame tighter details in distant scenery. Color saturation is punchier, sometimes verging on oversaturated. Both struggle with dynamic range, but Fuji slightly better retains highlight detail.

  • Macro: Pentax outperforms here thanks to its close focus distance around 3 cm versus the Fuji which lacks macro mode. The sensor-shift stabilization further assists crisp close-ups handheld.

  • Street photography: Both are quiet and compact, but Fuji’s smaller size and weight edge it a bit for long urban strolls. Neither handles low light spectacularly, but the Pentax’s higher maximum ISO might give some flexibility in dimmer settings - albeit noisy.

Still vs. Video: What About Moving Images?

Both cameras only offer 720p HD video max at 30 fps (Pentax supports also 15 fps modes which are less practical), using the dated Motion JPEG codec without 4K or even 1080p options. Audio input is non-existent on both, so relying on built-in mic only.

The FujiFilm lacks image stabilization entirely - so handheld video can be shaky. Pentax incorporates sensor-shift stabilization, making its footage smoother and more watchable, a clear edge if video is part of your brief.

Neither camera supports advanced exposure controls in video mode such as shutter/aperture priority or manual exposure - limiting creativity.

For casual short clips, both suffice, but don’t expect cinematic quality or flexible controls.

Battery Life and Storage: How Long Can You Shoot?

FujiFilm’s JX350 runs on NP-45A rechargeable battery with about 180 shots per charge. That’s tight by modern compact standards and means bringing spare batteries is wise for day trips.

Pentax uses a D-LI122 battery (unknown official rating), but in my testing, it delivered a noticeably longer runtime thanks to modern efficiencies. Both cameras accept SD/SDHC cards (Pentax expands to SDXC and also has small internal memory).

Connectivity is sparse: no Wi-Fi, no Bluetooth, no HDMI out - Pentax uniquely supports Eye-Fi cards for basic wireless transfer but nothing native.

In sum: Fuji’s battery life is a weak link; Pentax fares better but still not remarkable.

Build Quality & Weather Resistance: Can These Cameras Handle Real Life?

Neither camera offers weather sealing or ruggedized features like dustproofing or waterproofing. Both are plastic-bodied but feel reasonably solid in hand.

Pentax’s slightly larger frame and weight give it a more robust feel, while Fuji’s featherweight construction can feel a little fragile, especially in busy hands prone to bumps.

If you’re after a pocket companion for urban journeys or indoor shoots, both hold up. Outdoors in harsh weather or rugged conditions? Think twice.

Price-to-Performance: What Does Your Money Buy?

At typical street prices (circa $200 for the Fuji and about $106 for the Pentax), these cameras occupy the entry-level super compact market.

The FujiFilm JX350’s strengths lie in its excellent portability and simple user experience coupled with good image quality within its constraints. It’s appealing to casual users prioritizing size.

Conversely, the Pentax VS20 delivers better zoom reach, manual focusing options, and image stabilization - and at a significantly lower price point. If you want versatility and value without busting your budget, Pentax is tough to beat.

How They Stack Up in Different Photography Genres

Diving deeper, I've scored each camera across major photography genres based on real-world tests and specifications:

  • Portraits: Fuji edges out with better skin tone rendering and lens brightness.
  • Landscape: Pentax’s zoom makes distant details accessible; Fuji’s dynamic range helps retain highlight detail.
  • Wildlife: Pentax’s powerful zoom and stabilization shine.
  • Sports: Both cameras struggle with autofocus speed and continuous shooting.
  • Street: Fuji’s pocketability makes it a better companion.
  • Macro: Pentax is clear winner with close focus and stabilization.
  • Night/Astro: Neither excels, but Pentax permits higher ISO (noisy).
  • Video: Pentax better thanks to image stabilization.
  • Travel: Fuji is lighter and more compact, Pentax offers more reach at a bigger size.
  • Professional: Neither is suitable for critical pro workflows.

Final Scores and Verdict: Which Compact Wins?

Taking all factors into account - optical quality, versatility, usability, and price - here is the overall performance rating for each camera:

  • FujiFilm JX350: Scores higher on size, portability, and ease of use.
  • Pentax VS20: Leads on zoom range, manual control, stabilization, and value.

Who Should Buy the FujiFilm JX350?

If your priority is to have the smallest, lightest, and simplest camera to pop in your pocket during a trip, or casual outings with family, the JX350 offers a clean, straightforward shooting experience. Its faster wide aperture and pleasing color science bring solid results for portraits and day-to-day snapshots. However, be prepared to bring extra batteries and accept limited control and zoom reach.

Who Is The Pentax VS20 For?

The Pentax VS20 targets users who want more creative freedom with manual focusing and an enormous zoom range, plus camera stabilization to reduce blur. It’s ideal for travelers or outdoor enthusiasts who want to go beyond “point and shoot” without jumping up to a larger system camera. If you need to photograph wildlife, macro details, or prefer shooting video occasionally, the Pentax offers better versatility at a very attractive price point - at the cost of size and pocketability.

Putting It All Together: My Hands-On Takeaways

Having handled both cameras extensively, I value what each offers in their own niche. The FujiFilm JX350 is the quintessential “grab-and-go” compact best for those who prize portability with the occasional creative snapshot. The Pentax VS20 is your “all-rounder small sensor superzoom” packing more features, control, and zoom reach for adventurous photographers on a budget.

Neither challenges smartphones today in flexibility or image quality, but for enthusiasts wanting to experiment with optical zoom and manual control without heavy gear, these cameras remain relevant choices of their generation.

In today’s rapidly evolving camera landscape, choosing between the FujiFilm JX350 and Pentax VS20 boils down to what you prioritize more: the tiny form factor with simple snapping or the pragmatic versatility of zoom and stabilization on a shoestring budget. Hopefully my detailed experience brings clarity to your decision - and whichever you pick, happy shooting!

Summary Table: FujiFilm JX350 vs. Pentax VS20

Feature / Use Case FujiFilm JX350 Pentax VS20
Sensor 1/2.3" CCD, 16MP 1/2.3" CCD, 16MP
Zoom Range 5x (28-140 mm equiv.) 20x (28-560 mm equiv.)
Aperture Range f/2.6–6.2 f/3.1–4.8
Image Stabilization None Sensor-shift stabilization
Manual Focus No Yes
Screen Size & Resolution 2.7", 230k dots 3", 460k dots
Video 720p @ 30fps, Motion JPEG 720p @ 30fps, Motion JPEG
Battery Life ~180 shots Longer, unspecified
Weight 130 g 235 g
Price (approximate) $200 $106

With all the facts laid bare, I invite you to weigh the tradeoffs and choose your photographic partner wisely - and more importantly, start making memories with it.

Happy shooting, and may the light be with you!

FujiFilm JX350 vs Pentax VS20 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm JX350 and Pentax VS20
 FujiFilm FinePix JX350Pentax Optio VS20
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Pentax
Model FujiFilm FinePix JX350 Pentax Optio VS20
Alternative name FinePix JX355 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2011-01-05 2012-01-25
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3440 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Maximum boosted ISO 3200 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 3
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-560mm (20.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.6-6.2 f/3.1-4.8
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology TFT color LCD monitor TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1800 seconds 1/2500 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 2.80 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 130 gr (0.29 lb) 235 gr (0.52 lb)
Dimensions 94 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 111 x 61 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-45A D-LI122
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD / SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $200 $106