FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-80
95 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
91 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.6-6.2) lens
- 130g - 94 x 56 x 24mm
- Released January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix JX355
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2022
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-70
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the FujiFilm JX350 and Ricoh WG-80, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the JX350 (16MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe JX350 was announced 12 years prior to the WG-80 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the JX350 scores vs the WG-80 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix JX350 & Ricoh WG-80. The whole galleries are provided at FujiFilm JX350 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JX350 over the Ricoh WG-80
| JX350 | WG-80 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the FujiFilm JX350
| WG-80 | JX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2022 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 138 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus |
Common features in the FujiFilm JX350 and Ricoh WG-80
| JX350 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.70" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm JX350 provides outside dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-80 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm JX350 and Ricoh WG-80 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the JX350 against the WG-80.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the JX350 and WG-80 is 95 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements purely by going through specifications. The photograph underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the JX350 and WG-80.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of images but you may want to factor the age of the cameras into account. The older JX350 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix JX350 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix JX350 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Other name | FinePix JX355 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2022-05-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-6.2 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.70" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1800 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 130g (0.29 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $200 | $300 |