FujiFilm JZ300 vs Ricoh WG-M1
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d957/9d957fa4f25315fa49f471ccdd8ddb6dc0eaeb7b" alt="FujiFilm FinePix JZ300 front FujiFilm FinePix JZ300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62a6a/62a6a983a6af3568f6b39137b109a895b4f78a46" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 front Ricoh WG-M1 front"
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
FujiFilm JZ300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 168g - 97 x 57 x 29mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally referred to as FinePix JZ305
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
FujiFilm JZ300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the FujiFilm JZ300 and Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the JZ300 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The JZ300 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the WG-M1 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the JZ300 scores vs the WG-M1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
FujiFilm JZ300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix JZ300 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm JZ300 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JZ300 over the Ricoh WG-M1
JZ300 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the FujiFilm JZ300
WG-M1 | JZ300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2014 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 56 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm JZ300 and Ricoh WG-M1
JZ300 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm JZ300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you need to factor its weight and size. The FujiFilm JZ300 features physical dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 29mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm JZ300 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the JZ300 and the WG-M1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f92a/0f92a591edd8741bfc9814204ea01802585defb0" alt="FujiFilm JZ300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison FujiFilm JZ300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the JZ300 and WG-M1 is 93 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06187/061877bf685d9ff960d6ddbd1899012f172aea5e" alt="FujiFilm JZ300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm JZ300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison"
FujiFilm JZ300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions only by going through a spec sheet. The picture underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the JZ300 and WG-M1.
As you can see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-M1 to produce more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged JZ300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad1ac/ad1ac5601319d341fedf94cded8cbe4e5186ff1d" alt="FujiFilm JZ300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison FujiFilm JZ300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison"
FujiFilm JZ300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ead80/ead8052e0ed50add94b34470c746c696ecf1bd78" alt="FujiFilm JZ300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm JZ300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
FujiFilm JZ300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix JZ300 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix JZ300 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Also Known as | FinePix JZ305 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2014-09-12 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | (1×) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.6 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 1.5" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 2.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 168g (0.37 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 29mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-45A | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $180 | $2,000 |