FujiFilm S200EXR vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally Known as FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Introduced August 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm S200EXR vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are sold by FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the S200EXR (12MP) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) is very comparable but the S200EXR (1/1.6") and Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S200EXR was manufactured 13 months prior to the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the S200EXR grades versus the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm S200EXR vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR and Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery and Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| S200EXR | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2010 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 13 months |
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 1150k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+920k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| S200EXR | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The FujiFilm S200EXR provides outer measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 has sizing of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the S200EXR compared to the Fujifilm Real 3D W3.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200EXR and Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is 54 and 90 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specs. The picture underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S200EXR and Fujifilm Real 3D W3.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The S200EXR because of its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the FujiFilm S200EXR will produce greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged S200EXR will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | FujiFilm |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 |
| Also called as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2010-08-17 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,150k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m | 3.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 865g (1.91 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-140 | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $500 | $900 |