FujiFilm S200EXR vs Panasonic ZS35
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1438/d14385703c610eaca90a6d6ea949c25068a4050f" alt="FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79b96/79b9603f77f7c51f1ac0c53523d43d29d519fd6f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front"
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Released July 2009
- Additionally Known as FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Released January 2014
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS30
- Updated by Panasonic ZS40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the FujiFilm S200EXR and Panasonic ZS35, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and ZS35 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The S200EXR was introduced 5 years earlier than the ZS35 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise overview of how the S200EXR matches up vs the ZS35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The whole galleries are available at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery and Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Panasonic ZS35
S200EXR | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
ZS35 | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 54 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Panasonic ZS35
S200EXR | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S200EXR enjoys outside dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS35 has proportions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm S200EXR and Panasonic ZS35 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the S200EXR compared to the ZS35.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5635c/5635c624fd077106ef3129403f8224c029215f8e" alt="FujiFilm S200EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S200EXR and ZS35 is 54 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/530fd/530fddf91acd2cdf1223a88db1817166f35cf115" alt="FujiFilm S200EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison"
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the S200EXR and ZS35.
Clearly, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The S200EXR with its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic ZS35 will result in greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older S200EXR will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bac4/2bac4acab6a777fc97c6a3b29ecc4b7aa09402c9" alt="FujiFilm S200EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison"
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3050/f30501a1c77dff765e683300776c5efb3f71ad8d" alt="FujiFilm S200EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Otherwise known as | FinePix S205EXR | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-07-22 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 865 grams (1.91 pounds) | 305 grams (0.67 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-140 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $500 | $300 |