FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX2
54 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Announced July 2009
- Other Name is FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX2, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and CX2 (9MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and CX2 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe S200EXR was introduced very close to the CX2 which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the S200EXR matches up against the CX2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR and Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are available at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Ricoh CX2
| S200EXR | CX2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| CX2 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Ricoh CX2
| S200EXR | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2009 |  | August 2009 | Similar generation |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm S200EXR has external dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") along with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the S200EXR compared to the CX2.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the S200EXR and CX2 is 54 and 93 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through technical specs. The pic here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200EXR and CX2.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The S200EXR having a larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the FujiFilm S200EXR will give you extra detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos much more aggressively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Ricoh CX2 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 865 gr (1.91 lbs) | 185 gr (0.41 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-140 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $500 | $341 |