FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung SL30
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung SL30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Released July 2009
- Other Name is FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES15
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung SL30 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung SL30, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S200EXR (12MP) and the SL30 (10MP) is pretty close but the S200EXR (1/1.6") and SL30 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S200EXR was revealed 6 months after the SL30 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL30 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the S200EXR grades against the SL30 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung SL30 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR and Samsung SL30. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery and Samsung SL30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Samsung SL30
| S200EXR | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| SL30 | S200EXR |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung SL30
| S200EXR | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2009 |  | February 2009 | Same generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung SL30 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm S200EXR features external measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") along with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) while the Samsung SL30 has measurements of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung SL30 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the S200EXR vs the SL30.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S200EXR and SL30 is 54 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung SL30 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions merely by viewing a spec sheet. The picture here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the S200EXR and SL30.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The S200EXR with its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the FujiFilm S200EXR will provide you with more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung SL30 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung SL30 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung SL30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung SL30 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix S205EXR | ES15 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 865g (1.91 pounds) | 140g (0.31 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-140 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $500 | $93 |