FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB30F
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33


96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Released July 2009
- Additionally referred to as FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2013

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Let's look more closely at the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB30F, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and WB30F (16MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and WB30F (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.

The S200EXR was announced 4 years earlier than the WB30F which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the S200EXR scores vs the WB30F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR & Samsung WB30F. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Samsung WB30F
S200EXR | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the FujiFilm S200EXR
WB30F | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 42 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung WB30F
S200EXR | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S200EXR has got outer dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB30F has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB30F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the S200EXR and the WB30F.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200EXR and WB30F is 54 and 96 respectively.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200EXR and WB30F.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The S200EXR having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB30F will deliver greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged S200EXR is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung WB30F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung WB30F |
Also called as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-07-22 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 865 grams (1.91 lbs) | 128 grams (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-140 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $500 | $180 |