Clicky

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB750

Portability
54
Imaging
36
Features
29
Overall
33
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front
 
Samsung WB750 front
Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
50
Overall
41

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs

FujiFilm S200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
  • 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Alternative Name is FinePix S205EXR
Samsung WB750
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
  • Introduced September 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB750 Overview

Lets look much closer at the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Samsung WB750, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the S200EXR (12MP) and the WB750 (13MP) is pretty similar but the S200EXR (1/1.6") and WB750 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The S200EXR was manufactured 3 years earlier than the WB750 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera.

Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the S200EXR grades versus the WB750 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Samsung WB750

 S200EXR WB750 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the FujiFilm S200EXR

 WB750 S200EXR 
IntroducedSeptember 2011July 2009Fresher by 25 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung WB750

 S200EXR WB750 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S200EXR offers exterior dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) and the Samsung WB750 has dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Analyze the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Samsung WB750 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the S200EXR vs the WB750.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB750 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the S200EXR and WB750 is 54 and 93 respectively.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB750 top view buttons comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading specs. The photograph below will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the S200EXR and WB750.

All in all, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The S200EXR due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung WB750 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older S200EXR is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB750 sensor size comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB750 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB750 as a Portrait photography camera
45
you can focus manually
has face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/1.6")
41
focusing manually
MP count decent (13MP)
supports face detection focusing
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Street photography information
Samsung WB750 Street photography information
45
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/1.6")
heavier than average (865g)
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (193 grams)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with FujiFilm S200EXR
Sports photography with Samsung WB750
34
great zoom range (31-436mm 14.1 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.6")
lack of phase detect AF
51
long zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (13 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB750 as a Travel photography camera
38
built-in flash
very long reach (436mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than average (865g)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than others (193g)
MP count decent (13MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
great reach (432mm)
missing Time Lapse function
does not offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Landscape photography details
Samsung WB750 Landscape photography details
34
you can focus manually
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inch)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/1.6")
doesn't have Time Lapse function
48
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (13MP)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Vlogging information
Samsung WB750 Vlogging information
19
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
wide angle not the best (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have mic socket
heavier than average (865g)
34
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others (193 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
missing external mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB750 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung WB750
 FujiFilm FinePix S200EXRSamsung WB750
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Samsung
Model type FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR Samsung WB750
Also called as FinePix S205EXR -
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-07-22 2011-09-01
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by EXR -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.6" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8 x 6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 48.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 13 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 4096 x 3072
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Max enhanced ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 31-436mm (14.1x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.3 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing distance 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 4.5 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Features
Min shutter speed 30s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 2.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.20 m 3.30 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 865 grams (1.91 lb) 193 grams (0.43 lb)
Dimensions 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-140 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Launch cost $500 $339