FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB850F
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1438/d14385703c610eaca90a6d6ea949c25068a4050f" alt="FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15418/15418ee0968ee6e7d25e3170c052632adc898e25" alt="Samsung WB850F front Samsung WB850F front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Launched July 2009
- Also referred to as FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Announced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Here is a in-depth analysis of the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Samsung WB850F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and WB850F (16MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and WB850F (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The S200EXR was revealed 3 years prior to the WB850F and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB850F being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the S200EXR grades against the WB850F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR & Samsung WB850F. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Samsung WB850F
S200EXR | WB850F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the FujiFilm S200EXR
WB850F | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung WB850F
S200EXR | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S200EXR offers physical dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB850F has proportions of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Samsung WB850F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the S200EXR and the WB850F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afd91/afd916446d30830e29fe5139854b3ccb79bda032" alt="FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB850F size comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB850F size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the S200EXR and WB850F is 54 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b118/2b11846cc733bd7dab5ca602f282f12a06531654" alt="FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB850F top view buttons comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB850F top view buttons comparison"
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to see the gap between sensor sizing only by reviewing specs. The graphic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200EXR and WB850F.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The S200EXR with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB850F will deliver more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The older S200EXR is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08d2e/08d2e6d272d88b2335caaca39fefe8b78dbbe880" alt="FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB850F sensor size comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB850F sensor size comparison"
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/119b7/119b71c13b2db448f622e48654321f1e91b781c8" alt="FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB850F Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB850F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung WB850F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung WB850F |
Also called as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2012-01-09 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | AMOLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 865 grams (1.91 pounds) | 250 grams (0.55 pounds) |
Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-140 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $500 | $599 |