FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma Quattro H
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33


78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternate Name is FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Below, we will be matching up the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Sigma Quattro H, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers FujiFilm and Sigma. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and Quattro H (APS-H) come with totally different sensor size.

The S200EXR was released 7 years before the Quattro H which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the S200EXR grades vs the Quattro H when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR and Sigma sd Quattro H. The complete galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery and Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Sigma Quattro H
S200EXR | Quattro H |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the FujiFilm S200EXR
Quattro H | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 80 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Sigma Quattro H
S200EXR | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you have to think about its weight and size. The FujiFilm S200EXR features outer measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro H has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Sigma Quattro H in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the S200EXR compared to the Quattro H.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the S200EXR and Quattro H is 54 and 78 respectively.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through a spec sheet. The pic below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S200EXR and Quattro H.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The S200EXR featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Sigma Quattro H will give greater detail as a result of its extra 33MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged S200EXR is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Sigma |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Also Known as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | APS-H |
Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 45 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6200 x 4152 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | 3.8 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | - |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 865 grams (1.91 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-140 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $500 | $1,134 |