Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FS42

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front
Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Introduced March 2006
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Older Model is Olympus E-300
  • Updated by Olympus E-450
Panasonic FS42
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000 (Raise to 6400)
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
  • Released April 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview

Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic FS42, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and FS42 (1/2.5") posses totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-330 was unveiled 4 years before the FS42 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the E-330 grades versus the FS42 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic FS42

 E-330 FS42 
Manually focus More exact focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus E-330

 FS42 E-330 
ReleasedApril 2009March 2006Newer by 37 months
Display resolution230k215kSharper display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic FS42

 E-330 FS42 
Display dimensions2.5"2.5"Equal display size
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 enjoys exterior dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Panasonic FS42 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic FS42 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-330 against the FS42.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and FS42 is 65 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by looking at technical specs. The picture below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and FS42.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 with its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FS42 will resolve more detail having an extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic FS42 Portrait photography highlights
54
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
low MP (7MP)
19
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
no external flash support
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography factors
Panasonic FS42 Street photography factors
60
screen tilts up and down
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than average in class (616 grams)
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
47
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
max ISO too low (1,000)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FS42 as a Sports photography camera
40
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low MP (7MP)
16
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography highlights
Panasonic FS42 Travel photography highlights
50
lighter than average in class (616 grams)
has built in flash
no Time Lapse function
low MP (7MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
51
has built in flash
no Time Lapse mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography factors
Panasonic FS42 Landscape photography factors
45
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inches)
no image stabilization
low MP (7MP)
max ISO too low (400)
no Time Lapse function
22
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.5")
max ISO too low (1,000)
doesn't have RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FS42 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video shooting
22
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
no mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Panasonic FS42
 Olympus E-330Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-330 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42
Also referred to as EVOLT E-330 -
Type Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Introduced 2006-03-18 2009-04-17
Physical type Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.5"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 7MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3136 x 2352 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 400 1000
Highest boosted ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 33-132mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 6.3
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inch 2.5 inch
Resolution of display 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 6.30 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616 grams (1.36 lb) 132 grams (0.29 lb)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $1,100 $580