FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus E-500
75 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
70 Imaging
42 Features
34 Overall
38
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus E-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 74 x 82mm
- Released February 2010
- Alternate Name is FinePix S2900HD
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
- Updated by Olympus E-510
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus E-500 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the FujiFilm S2800HD and Olympus E-500, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the S2800HD (14MP) and E-500 (8MP) and the S2800HD (1/2.3") and E-500 (Four Thirds) feature different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S2800HD was released 4 years later than the E-500 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S2800HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick view of how the S2800HD matches up vs the E-500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus E-500 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD & Olympus E-500. The complete galleries are available at FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery & Olympus E-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2800HD over the Olympus E-500
| S2800HD | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2010 |  | October 2005 | More recent by 53 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 215k | Sharper screen (+15k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the FujiFilm S2800HD
| E-500 | S2800HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2800HD and Olympus E-500
| S2800HD | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus E-500 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you should take into account its weight and volume. The FujiFilm S2800HD enjoys outside dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") and a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus E-500 has sizing of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm S2800HD and Olympus E-500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the S2800HD vs the E-500.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the S2800HD and E-500 is 75 and 70 respectively.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus E-500 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing technical specs. The visual here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the S2800HD and E-500.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The S2800HD due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the FujiFilm S2800HD will render greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer S2800HD provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus E-500 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus E-500 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Olympus E-500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Olympus E-500 |
| Also called | FinePix S2900HD | EVOLT E-500 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2005-10-21 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 8 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens focal range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 45 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 215k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 99 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.45x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 437 grams (0.96 lb) | 479 grams (1.06 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 74 x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $260 | $600 |
