FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SZ-10
75 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
![FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD front FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-S2800HD/FujiFilm-S2800HD-front.jpg)
![Olympus SZ-10 front Olympus SZ-10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-SZ-10/Olympus-SZ-10-front.jpg)
90 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 74 x 82mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally Known as FinePix S2900HD
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Released February 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SZ-10 Overview
The following is a complete review of the FujiFilm S2800HD and Olympus SZ-10, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the S2800HD (14MP) and the SZ-10 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The S2800HD was manufactured 12 months earlier than the SZ-10 and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature different body design with the FujiFilm S2800HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the S2800HD matches up vs the SZ-10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SZ-10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD and Olympus SZ-10. The entire galleries are provided at FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery and Olympus SZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2800HD over the Olympus SZ-10
S2800HD | SZ-10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the FujiFilm S2800HD
SZ-10 | S2800HD | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 12 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2800HD and Olympus SZ-10
S2800HD | SZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SZ-10 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm S2800HD comes with physical dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-10 has measurements of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Examine the FujiFilm S2800HD and Olympus SZ-10 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the S2800HD vs the SZ-10.
![FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SZ-10 size comparison FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SZ-10 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-S2800HD-vs-Olympus-SZ-10-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S2800HD and SZ-10 is 75 and 90 respectively.
![FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SZ-10 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SZ-10 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-S2800HD-vs-Olympus-SZ-10-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading technical specs. The pic here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the S2800HD and SZ-10.
As you can tell, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical MP and you should expect similar quality of pictures however you would want to take the production date of the products into consideration. The more aged S2800HD is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
![FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SZ-10 sensor size comparison FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SZ-10 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-S2800HD-vs-Olympus-SZ-10-sensor-size-comparison.png)
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
![FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-S2800HD-vs-Olympus-SZ-10-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SZ-10 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Olympus SZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Olympus SZ-10 |
Also called as | FinePix S2900HD | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.1-4.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 99 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.40 m | 7.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 437 grams (0.96 pounds) | 215 grams (0.47 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 74 x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $260 | $300 |