FujiFilm S2800HD vs Ricoh WG-M1
75 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 74 x 82mm
- Announced February 2010
- Other Name is FinePix S2900HD
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Photography Glossary FujiFilm S2800HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the FujiFilm S2800HD versus Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the S2800HD (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S2800HD was released 5 years prior to the WG-M1 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the FujiFilm S2800HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the S2800HD grades vs the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm S2800HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD and Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are available at FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2800HD over the Ricoh WG-M1
| S2800HD | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 115k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the FujiFilm S2800HD
| WG-M1 | S2800HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 | February 2010 | More recent by 56 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2800HD and Ricoh WG-M1
| S2800HD | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and size. The FujiFilm S2800HD enjoys outer dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") along with a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm S2800HD versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the S2800HD and the WG-M1.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the S2800HD and WG-M1 is 75 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through specifications. The photograph underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the S2800HD and WG-M1.
Plainly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of pictures though you have to take the release date of the cameras into account. The older S2800HD will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Alternative name | FinePix S2900HD | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 1.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 99% | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 437 grams (0.96 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 74 x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $260 | $2,000 |