Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A6300
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Launched February 2016
- Older Model is Sony A6000
- Updated by Sony A6500
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A6300 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A6300, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and A6300 (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-1 was brought out 6 years earlier than the A6300 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the XZ-1 grades vs the A6300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A6300 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-1 & Sony Alpha a6300. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony A6300
XZ-1 | A6300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus XZ-1
A6300 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | January 2011 | Fresher by 61 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 922k | 614k | Crisper display (+308k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony A6300
XZ-1 | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-1 features physical dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Sony A6300 has measurements of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A6300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-1 compared to the A6300.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and A6300 is 88 and 83 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading a spec sheet. The visual here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and A6300.
Clearly, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A6300 will deliver more detail having its extra 14MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The older XZ-1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A6300 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha a6300 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-01-26 | 2016-02-03 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 614k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 11.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275g (0.61 lb) | 404g (0.89 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 34 | 85 |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 13.7 |
DXO Low light score | 117 | 1437 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 400 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $567 | $889 |