FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung TL240
75 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 74 x 82mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Other Name is FinePix S2900HD
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternate Name is ST5000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung TL240 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the FujiFilm S2800HD and Samsung TL240, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the S2800HD (14MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is pretty similar and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe S2800HD was announced within a month of the TL240 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S2800HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a short summary of how the S2800HD scores versus the TL240 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD and Samsung TL240. The whole galleries are provided at FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2800HD over the Samsung TL240
| S2800HD | TL240 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the FujiFilm S2800HD
| TL240 | S2800HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2800HD and Samsung TL240
| S2800HD | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2010 |  | January 2010 | Similar generation |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S2800HD provides physical dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") having a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the FujiFilm S2800HD and Samsung TL240 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the S2800HD and the TL240.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S2800HD and TL240 is 75 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over technical specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the S2800HD and TL240.
As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels so you should expect similar quality of files but you should always take the production date of the products into consideration.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Samsung TL240 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix S2900HD | ST5000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 99% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 437g (0.96 pounds) | 160g (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 74 x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $260 | $171 |