FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB35F
76 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 73 x 81mm
- Released January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix S2990
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the FujiFilm S2950 and Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S2950 (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is pretty close and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S2950 was launched 4 years earlier than the WB35F which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S2950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the S2950 grades versus the WB35F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S2950 & Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are provided at FujiFilm S2950 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2950 over the Samsung WB35F
| S2950 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the FujiFilm S2950
| WB35F | S2950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 36 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2950 and Samsung WB35F
| S2950 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S2950 has got outer measurements of 110mm x 73mm x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") having a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the FujiFilm S2950 and Samsung WB35F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the S2950 compared to the WB35F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S2950 and WB35F is 76 and 93 respectively.
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching a spec sheet. The pic here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the S2950 and WB35F.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Samsung WB35F to render more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged S2950 will be behind in sensor technology.
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S2950 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S2950 | Samsung WB35F |
| Also Known as | FinePix S2990 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 437g (0.96 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 73 x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery type | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $330 | $130 |