FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB800F
76 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 73 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix S2990
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Photography Glossary FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the S2950 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is relatively close and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S2950 was manufactured 24 months earlier than the WB800F which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S2950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick summary of how the S2950 scores against the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S2950 and Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S2950 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2950 over the Samsung WB800F
| S2950 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the FujiFilm S2950
| WB800F | S2950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2950 and Samsung WB800F
| S2950 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S2950 offers outside dimensions of 110mm x 73mm x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") with a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the S2950 against the WB800F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the S2950 and WB800F is 76 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the S2950 and WB800F.
As you can see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Samsung WB800F to render greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older S2950 will be behind in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S2950 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S2950 | Samsung WB800F |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix S2990 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 437 grams (0.96 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 73 x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Battery format | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $330 | $300 |