FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB800F
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix S3250
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the S3200 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S3200 was released 24 months before the WB800F making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the FujiFilm S3200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summation of how the S3200 scores against the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix S3200 & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S3200 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S3200 over the Samsung WB800F
| S3200 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the FujiFilm S3200
| WB800F | S3200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 24 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm S3200 and Samsung WB800F
| S3200 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S3200 offers exterior dimensions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the S3200 vs the WB800F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S3200 and WB800F is 67 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements only by going over a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the S3200 and WB800F.
Clearly, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB800F to offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The older S3200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Samsung WB800F |
| Other name | FinePix S3250 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 540 grams (1.19 lbs) | 218 grams (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery style | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $190 | $300 |