FujiFilm S4000 vs Panasonic ZS35
Portability
67 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
67 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Portability
89 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
89 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
FujiFilm S4000 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
FujiFilm S4000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Released January 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix S4050
Panasonic ZS35
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Revealed January 2014
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS30
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS40
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm S4000 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the FujiFilm S4000 and Panasonic ZS35, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Panasonic. The image resolution of the S4000 (14MP) and the ZS35 (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S4000 was manufactured 4 years before the ZS35 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the FujiFilm S4000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a short overview of how the S4000 scores versus the ZS35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm S4000 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix S4000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The entire galleries are provided at FujiFilm S4000 Gallery and Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S4000 over the Panasonic ZS35
| S4000 | ZS35 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the FujiFilm S4000
| ZS35 | S4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 36 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the FujiFilm S4000 and Panasonic ZS35
| S4000 | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm S4000 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S4000 offers physical measurements of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS35 has dimensions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm S4000 and Panasonic ZS35 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the S4000 versus the ZS35.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the S4000 and ZS35 is 67 and 89 respectively.
FujiFilm S4000 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading specs. The image underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the S4000 and ZS35.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Panasonic ZS35 to deliver greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged S4000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm S4000 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm S4000 Portrait photography factors
Panasonic ZS35 Portrait photography factors
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
manual focus not available
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
MP count decent (16MP)
includes face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Street photography with FujiFilm S4000
Street photography with Panasonic ZS35
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
heavier than average (540 grams)
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (305 grams)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
FujiFilm S4000 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Sports photography camera
amazing zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
supports tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
incredible zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Travel photography with FujiFilm S4000
Travel photography with Panasonic ZS35
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
very long zoom (720mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than average (540 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
lighter than competition in class (305g)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
very long zoom (480mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm S4000 Landscape photography features
Panasonic ZS35 Landscape photography features
really wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
does not have Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm S4000 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Vlogging camera
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic support
heavier than average (540 grams)
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (305 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
FujiFilm S4000 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S4000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S4000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
| Also referred to as | FinePix S4050 | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-06 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 21 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 540g (1.19 lb) | 305g (0.67 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Form of battery | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $279 | $300 |