FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon A900
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Released January 2011
- Also Known as FinePix T205
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Released February 2016
- Refreshed by Nikon A1000
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon A900 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the FujiFilm T200 versus Nikon A900, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Nikon. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the T200 (14MP) and A900 (20MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe T200 was manufactured 6 years prior to the A900 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the T200 scores against the A900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon A900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix T200 and Nikon Coolpix A900. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm T200 Gallery and Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Nikon A900
| T200 | A900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the FujiFilm T200
| A900 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 62 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Nikon A900
| T200 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm T200 provides outer measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Nikon A900 has proportions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm T200 versus Nikon A900 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the T200 compared to the A900.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the T200 and A900 is 94 and 88 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by looking through specifications. The visual here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the T200 and A900.
To sum up, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should count on the Nikon A900 to result in extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older T200 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon A900 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
| Also called as | FinePix T205 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.4-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 151g (0.33 lb) | 289g (0.64 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | 300 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $160 | $400 |
