FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9300
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9300 Key Specs
FujiFilm T200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Launched January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix T205
Nikon S9300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Introduced July 2012
- Previous Model is Nikon S9100
- Later Model is Nikon S9500
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9300 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the FujiFilm T200 versus Nikon S9300, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Nikon. The resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the S9300 (16MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe T200 was manufactured 18 months prior to the S9300 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the T200 matches up vs the S9300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix T200 and Nikon Coolpix S9300. The entire galleries are provided at FujiFilm T200 Gallery and Nikon S9300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Nikon S9300
| T200 | S9300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the FujiFilm T200
| S9300 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2012 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 18 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Nikon S9300
| T200 | S9300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9300 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm T200 has got physical dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Nikon S9300 has measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm T200 versus Nikon S9300 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the T200 versus the S9300.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the T200 and S9300 is 94 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the T200 and S9300.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should expect the Nikon S9300 to provide you with more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged T200 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm T200 as a Portrait photography camera
Nikon S9300 as a Portrait photography camera
good MP (14MP)
comes with face detection focus
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
good resolution (16 megapixels)
features face detect focus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
FujiFilm T200 as a Street photography camera
Nikon S9300 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (215g)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Sports photography advice
Nikon S9300 Sports photography advice
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
low fps (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery (180 shots)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
incredible zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
features tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (200 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Travel photography highlights
Nikon S9300 Travel photography highlights
good MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
very long reach (280mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
terrible battery (180 CIPA)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
lighter than competitors in class (215 grams)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
very long reach (450mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
bad battery pack (200 shots)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Landscape photography highlights
Nikon S9300 Landscape photography highlights
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
terrible battery (180 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
relatively wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
bad battery pack (200 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Vlogging details
Nikon S9300 Vlogging details
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic socket
relatively wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (215g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9300 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Nikon Coolpix S9300 |
| Also called | FinePix T205 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2012-07-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 4cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 6.9 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 151g (0.33 lbs) | 215g (0.47 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | 200 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $160 | $249 |