FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung SL102
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
![FujiFilm FinePix T200 front FujiFilm FinePix T200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-T200/FujiFilm-T200-front.jpg)
![Samsung SL102 front Samsung SL102 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-SL102/Samsung-SL102-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Launched January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix T205
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the T200 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The T200 was revealed 2 years after the SL102 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the T200 matches up against the SL102 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix T200 & Samsung SL102. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm T200 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Samsung SL102
T200 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 25 months |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the FujiFilm T200
SL102 | T200 |
---|
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Samsung SL102
T200 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and size. The FujiFilm T200 has got exterior measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the T200 against the SL102.
![FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-T200-vs-Samsung-SL102-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the T200 and SL102 is 94 and 96 respectively.
![FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-T200-vs-Samsung-SL102-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing technical specs. The picture below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the T200 and SL102.
As you can tell, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the FujiFilm T200 to render extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The newer T200 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
![FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-T200-vs-Samsung-SL102-sensor-size-comparison.png)
FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
![FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-T200-vs-Samsung-SL102-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Samsung SL102 |
Alternative name | FinePix T205 | ES55 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.60 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 151 grams (0.33 lbs) | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $160 | $130 |